🔗 Share this article

The recent departures of the BBC's director general and its head of news over claims of bias have been portrayed as an internal "coup" by a former newspaper editor.

David Yelland, who formerly edited the Sun publication from 1998 to 2003, claimed during a radio program that the exits of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness came after methodical weakening by individuals close to the BBC board over an prolonged timeframe.

"It constituted a takeover, and more serious than that, it represented an inside job. There existed people within the corporation, very close to the leadership ... on the governing body, who have systematically undermined Tim Davie and his executive staff over a period of [time] and this has been ongoing for a considerable period. What transpired yesterday wasn't merely in vacuum," the former editor remarked.

Governance Failure Highlighted

"What has transpired here is there was a failure of leadership. I don't hold responsible the chairman [Samir Shah] as an individual, but the responsibility of the chair of any institution, a corporation – encompassing the BBC – is to maintain their CEO, their top executive, in role or dismiss them. And that has not occurred, because Tim Davie was not fired. He resigned and so there existed, that represents the essence of, a failure of leadership."

Context of Recent Dispute

The resignations on Sunday came after days of attacks from the White House and rightwing commentators in the UK that were triggered by allegations published by the Daily Telegraph.

The newspaper disclosed a leaked account of the findings of a previous outside consultant to its editorial guidelines committee, Michael Prescott, who left his position during the warmer months.

He had criticized the editing of a speech by Donald Trump in an edition of Panorama, which he asserted made it seem that Trump had supported the US Capitol attack. Two portions of the speech that were spliced together were spoken an sixty minutes apart, and the edit failed to mention that Trump had also stated he desired his followers to protest non-violently.

Internal Reactions and External Viewpoints

Yelland's comments mirror a sentiment of concern reported by insiders within BBC News on Sunday evening, with one saying: "It seems like a coup. This represents the outcome of a campaign by partisan enemies of the BBC."

Different voices, including Sky's previous policy correspondent Adam Boulton, have stated the overall impression that Trump encouraged the insurrection was essentially accurate. It is not unusual practice to combine sections of a long speech to properly summarize it.

Handover Plans and Institutional Effect

Davie indicated his exit would wouldn't be instant and that he was "managing" timings to guarantee an "smooth handover" over the coming period. Turness commented controversy around the Panorama edit had "arrived at a point where it is causing damage to the BBC – an institution that I love."

On Monday, the BBC journalist Nick Robinson stated there had been paralysis at the highest levels of the BBC because, while its experienced journalists desired to apologize for the editing error – but maintain there was "no plan to mislead" the audience – the government-selected leaders wanted to go further.

Governmental Response and Wider Context

Shah is expected to express regret on Monday to the Commons' culture, media and sport committee, and to provide additional information on the Panorama program in his response to the panel, which had asked how he would address the issues.

Speaking after the resignations, the cabinet official Louise Sandher-Jones rejected suggestions the BBC was institutionally partial. The veterans minister told Sky News: "When you examine the vast spectrum of national matters, regional concerns, global affairs, that it has to report, I think its output is highly trusted. When I speak to individuals who've got firmly established views on those, they're still utilizing the BBC for a lot of their information, it's shaping their perspectives on this."